Two stories from the Chronicle of Philanthropy last Thursday caught my eye.
The first is about congressional rumblings to have nonprofits post fundraising ratios and costs on a Postal Service web site.
Seriously.
No information was given on where the charities would pull this information from, when it would be updated and weather it would be checked out or not for accuracy. Not to mention who would maintain this database, how it would be funded or what kind of education and outreach about the information on said site and how to use it.
The second article is more in depth. It starts out with the IRS Commissioner Steven T. Miller stating that, even though the IRS may not have the jurisdiction to, it will be more aggressive in monitoring the "efficiency and effectiveness of charitable organizations." He was also disappointed that the IRS gave up the idea of placing "efficiency indicators." on the front of the 990 because he wants to help make "apples-to-apples" comparisons possible.
I was against having the "efficiency indicators" there precisely because I don't think that it helps much for comparison. Standard benchmarks like the ones listed in the article may be informative but I do not believe they tell you how efficient a charity is, especially in comparison to other charities. For profit businesses are formed to make profit. A dollar of profit is the same at one business as it is at another, so ratios work and are comparable. But nonprofits are formed to do many different things, too many to be able to come up with easy ratios and benchmarks that cross the sectors of the charitable universe.
Would you compare a big nonprofit hospital to a small after school sports program? You could but I don't think you would get much that is useful. Now hospital to hospital, sports program to sports program? You could make some comparisons with benchmarks and ratios that could yield some interesting information.
The myopic thinking that all nonprofits are the same just because they are nonprofits still baffles me. Especially in people who task themselves to regulate us.