Kate Barr at Balancing the Mission Checkbook has a nice piece on the recent report of an annual survey of public confidence in nonprofit groups by Professor Paul Light from NYU’s Wagner School of Public Service.
What intrigued me in her post is her mention of how Professor Light asks the questions about how nonprofits spend our money versus how I think the majority of nonprofits and foundations view our spending. The survey asks the public if they think nonprofits are spending their money wisely. Not program vs. management or any of the other typical benchmarks we use but if the public thinks we are doing a good job with our funds.
How could we show this for our own organizations? Is it possible that if a nonprofit spends 35% of its funds on administrative functions that the public would still view it as spending its funds wisely? Could foundations and corporate funders be persuaded to evaluate organizations in such a manner? Click the link above to find an example of an organization that may have figured out the right way to do it. Outcomes measurement is something we will all need to figure out a way to do for our nonprofits.
No comments:
Post a Comment